MU vs. LRCX

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's -0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 10.93%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.97% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is comparable to the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and LRCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than LRCX's 1.25% yield.

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 33.52% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 27.52%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.