MU vs. LRCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MU or LRCX.
Correlation
The correlation between MU and LRCX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MU vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MU:
0.29
LRCX:
-0.09
MU:
0.77
LRCX:
0.17
MU:
1.10
LRCX:
1.02
MU:
0.34
LRCX:
-0.10
MU:
0.64
LRCX:
-0.19
MU:
23.39%
LRCX:
20.31%
MU:
52.18%
LRCX:
43.33%
MU:
-98.25%
LRCX:
-87.91%
MU:
-41.15%
LRCX:
-35.93%
Fundamentals
MU:
$120.98B
LRCX:
$100.12B
MU:
$0.70
LRCX:
$3.09
MU:
155.14
LRCX:
25.18
MU:
0.17
LRCX:
1.50
MU:
$20.39B
LRCX:
$15.59B
MU:
$5.65B
LRCX:
$7.42B
MU:
$8.69B
LRCX:
$5.00B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's -7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 10.17%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.18% annualized return.
MU
5.91%
-8.39%
-35.29%
5.88%
10.82%
10.17%
LRCX
-7.41%
2.80%
-31.23%
-6.66%
20.79%
26.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MU vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MU vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than LRCX's 1.20% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.51% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Lam Research Corporation | 1.20% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% | 0.68% |
Drawdowns
MU vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MU vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 22.96% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 13.73%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MU vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities