MU vs. LRCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MU or LRCX.
Key characteristics
| MU | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 36.45% | 16.72% |
| 1Y Return | 88.94% | 86.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.33% | 13.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 22.30% | 38.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.38% | 35.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.32 | 2.53 |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.60% | 34.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.25% | -87.91% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.12% | -8.08% |
Fundamentals
| MU | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $130.55B | $128.21B |
| EPS | -$3.44 | $25.91 |
| PE Ratio | 9.30 | 37.74 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.12 | 2.78 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.31B | $14.32B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | -$1.42B | $7.87B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.66B | $4.39B |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and LRCX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MU vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 36.45% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 16.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 17.38%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MU vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MU vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than LRCX's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.85% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% | 0.68% |
Drawdowns
MU vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MU vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 18.10% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 9.22%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.