MU vs. CLS
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MU in Semiconductors, CLS in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 51.33%/yr vs 40.47%/yr for CLS. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MU vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 188.53% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed CLS with an annualized return of 51.33%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively lower 40.47% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
CLS
- 1D
- -6.00%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 65.84%
- 3Y*
- 149.34%
- 5Y*
- 106.30%
- 10Y*
- 40.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.16B | $852.74M | $822.47M | |
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B |
MU vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 12.12% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and CLS is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998 | 0.42 |
The correlation between MU and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MU:
$929.52B
CLS:
$38.11B
MU:
$44.42
CLS:
$9.64
MU:
18.53
CLS:
34.38
MU:
0.07
CLS:
0.46
MU:
10.36
CLS:
2.46
MU:
9.33
CLS:
15.53
MU:
$90.27B
CLS:
$15.62B
MU:
$65.51B
CLS:
$1.81B
MU:
$44.96B
CLS:
$1.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
MU
CLS
MU vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.19 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.92 | 1.83 | +15.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 64.08 | 4.27 | +59.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -96.93% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.10% | -36.21% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -53.96% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -53.96% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -80.60% | +22.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.17% | -29.84% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.02% | -73.10% | +15.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.31% | 15.47% | -5.16% |
Volatility
MU vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 31.11% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 25.97%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.11% | 25.97% | +5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.64% | 55.62% | +12.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.13% | 74.89% | +6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.32% | 58.52% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.42% | 50.65% | +0.77% |
Dividends
MU vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
MU vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MU vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 577.50M and revenue of 4.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 458.30M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 368.80M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and CLS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to CLS (25.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs CLS's -96.93%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer