PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTBA vs. EPRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MTBA vs. EPRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MTBA vs. EPRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
-0.43%7.74%1.99%3.64%
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
-4.28%2.69%3.46%6.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly higher than EPRF's -4.28% return.


MTBA

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EPRF

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
-6.59%
1Y
-0.37%
3Y*
2.18%
5Y*
-2.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTBA vs. EPRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EPRF's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MTBA vs. EPRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTBA
MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

EPRF
EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTBA vs. EPRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTBAEPRFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

-0.04

+1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

0.00

+1.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.00

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

-0.08

+1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

-0.20

+7.56

MTBA vs. EPRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTBA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the EPRF Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTBA and EPRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTBAEPRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

-0.04

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.07

+1.30

Correlation

The correlation between MTBA and EPRF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MTBA vs. EPRF - Dividend Comparison

MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than EPRF's 6.30% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
6.08%5.98%6.03%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
6.30%6.03%6.13%5.71%5.67%4.70%4.92%5.01%5.27%2.59%

Drawdowns

MTBA vs. EPRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum EPRF drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and EPRF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MTBAEPRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-26.82%

+23.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-8.59%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-12.78%

+10.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-7.31%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

3.25%

-2.59%

Volatility

MTBA vs. EPRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 1.65%, while Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MTBAEPRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

2.42%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

5.27%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

8.88%

-5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.97%

11.73%

-7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

13.57%

-9.60%