MTBA vs. EPRF
Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF).
MTBA and EPRF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MTBA is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Nov 6, 2023. EPRF is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on May 24, 2016.
Performance
MTBA vs. EPRF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MTBA vs. EPRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.43% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -4.28% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 6.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly higher than EPRF's -4.28% return.
MTBA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- -6.59%
- 1Y
- -0.37%
- 3Y*
- 2.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MTBA vs. EPRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EPRF's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MTBA vs. EPRF — Risk / Return Rank
MTBA
EPRF
MTBA vs. EPRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTBA | EPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | -0.04 | +1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 0.00 | +1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.00 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | -0.08 | +1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | -0.20 | +7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTBA | EPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | -0.04 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.07 | +1.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between MTBA and EPRF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MTBA vs. EPRF - Dividend Comparison
MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than EPRF's 6.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.08% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.30% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
MTBA vs. EPRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum EPRF drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and EPRF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTBA | EPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -26.82% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -8.59% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -12.78% | +10.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -7.31% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 3.25% | -2.59% |
Volatility
MTBA vs. EPRF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 1.65%, while Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MTBA | EPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 2.42% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | 5.27% | -3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 8.88% | -5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.97% | 11.73% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.97% | 13.57% | -9.60% |