EPRF vs. VRP
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and VRP (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock funds - EPRF tracks the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index while VRP tracks the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -2.10%/yr vs 4.06%/yr for VRP. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VRP.
Performance
EPRF vs. VRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than VRP's 1.98% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- -1.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.08%
VRP
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $130.96K | $126.83K | $172.59K | |
| $11.39M | $12.80M | $16.85M |
EPRF vs. VRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.35% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 9.43% | -20.68% | 1.37% | 7.38% | 19.54% | -5.58% | -0.39% |
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 1.98% | 7.34% | 11.10% | 10.35% | -9.00% | 4.20% | 5.11% | 18.84% | -6.62% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and VRP is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EPRF and VRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. VRP — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
VRP
EPRF vs. VRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPRF | VRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.34 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.71 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 8.89 | -9.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. VRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum VRP drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and VRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | VRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -46.04% | +19.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -2.89% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -4.26% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -13.76% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -0.78% | -10.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -2.28% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 0.55% | +4.28% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. VRP - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) at 0.69%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | VRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 0.69% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.51% | 2.38% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44% | 2.94% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 6.55% | +5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 14.53% | -1.14% |
EPRF vs. VRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than VRP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. VRP - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, which matches VRP's 6.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 6.19% | 6.53% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 5.38% | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.71% | 5.28% | 4.69% | 5.10% | 5.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and VRP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPRF has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to VRP (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs VRP's -46.04%.
On 5-year performance, VRP leads with 4.06% vs -2.10% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, VRP has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VRP has performed better with a 4.06% return vs -2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRP.
EPRF and VRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 6.18%.
EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while VRP tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.50% for VRP.
VRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and VRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer