EPRF vs. GAEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM).
EPRF and GAEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EPRF is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on May 24, 2016. GAEM is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Aug 12, 2024.
Performance
EPRF vs. GAEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPRF vs. GAEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -4.28% | 2.69% | -0.40% |
GAEM Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF | -1.25% | 13.55% | 3.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than GAEM's -1.25% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- -6.59%
- 1Y
- -0.37%
- 3Y*
- 2.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
GAEM
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 9.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPRF vs. GAEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GAEM's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. GAEM — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
GAEM
EPRF vs. GAEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | GAEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | 1.78 | -1.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | 2.67 | -2.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.36 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 2.79 | -2.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 11.88 | -12.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | GAEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 1.78 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 2.00 | -1.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and GAEM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EPRF vs. GAEM - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than GAEM's 6.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.30% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
GAEM Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF | 6.72% | 6.50% | 3.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. GAEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than GAEM's maximum drawdown of -3.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and GAEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | GAEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -3.84% | -22.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -3.61% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.78% | -2.80% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -0.51% | -6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 0.85% | +2.40% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. GAEM - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) at 2.27%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | GAEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 2.27% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.27% | 3.37% | +1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.88% | 5.50% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 4.88% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 4.88% | +8.69% |