PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTBA vs. BUCK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MTBABUCK
YTD Return4.52%5.50%
Daily Std Dev4.73%3.31%
Max Drawdown-2.55%-2.03%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.02%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between MTBA and BUCK is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MTBA vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 5.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.52%
2.82%
MTBA
BUCK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTBA vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for BUCK: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%
Expense ratio chart for MTBA: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTBA vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTBA
Sharpe ratio
No data
BUCK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BUCK, currently valued at 12.86, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.86

MTBA vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

MTBA vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than BUCK's 8.05% yield.


TTM20232022
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
4.32%0.48%0.00%
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
8.05%4.84%0.57%

Drawdowns

MTBA vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -2.55%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -2.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and BUCK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember0
-0.02%
MTBA
BUCK

Volatility

MTBA vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 0.58%, while Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.58%
1.20%
MTBA
BUCK