MTBA vs. AGGH
Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH).
MTBA and AGGH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MTBA is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Nov 6, 2023. AGGH is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Feb 14, 2022.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MTBA or AGGH.
Key characteristics
| MTBA | AGGH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.83% | 1.14% |
| 1Y Return | 4.90% | 6.04% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.85 | 1.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.07 | 0.90 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.36 | 3.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.10% | 2.29% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.61% | 9.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -2.84% | -13.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.57% | -5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTBA and AGGH is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MTBA vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 1.14% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MTBA vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MTBA vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MTBA vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than AGGH's 9.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 5.48% | 0.48% | 0.00% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 9.76% | 9.51% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
MTBA vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum AGGH drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and AGGH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MTBA vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 1.27%, while Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.