EPRF vs. PFFA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. EPRF is passively managed, while PFFA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -2.09%/yr vs 6.09%/yr for PFFA. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for PFFA.

Performance

EPRF vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than PFFA's 2.26% return.

EPRF

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: -2.56%
• 6M: -3.27%
• 1Y: 1.59%
• 3Y*: 3.00%
• 5Y*: -2.09%
• 10Y*: —

PFFA

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 11.54%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 6.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	-2.56%	2.69%	3.46%	9.43%	-20.68%	1.37%	7.38%	19.54%	-4.18%
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF	2.26%	8.22%	16.11%	26.45%	-20.91%	23.53%	-7.87%	31.99%	-7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and PFFA is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.66

The correlation between EPRF and PFFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EPRF vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF

EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 10
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

PFFA

PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 44
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPRF	PFFA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	1.62	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	2.32	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.30	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	1.79	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.38	5.90	-5.53

EPRF vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and PFFA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPRF	PFFA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-70.52%	+43.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-6.49%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-12.15%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.23%	-22.70%	-2.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.22%	-2.28%	-8.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-6.62%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	1.96%	+2.28%

Volatility

EPRF vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) have volatilities of 2.08% and 2.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPRF	PFFA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	2.13%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.47%	5.91%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.63%	7.16%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.83%	11.54%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.46%	31.74%	-18.28%

EPRF vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPRF vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, less than PFFA's 9.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	6.19%	6.03%	6.13%	5.71%	5.67%	4.70%	4.92%	5.01%	5.27%	2.59%
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF	9.79%	9.47%	9.18%	9.56%	10.75%	7.64%	8.54%	10.02%	5.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPRF and PFFA in my portfolio?

EPRF and PFFA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPRF or PFFA?

PFFA has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to EPRF (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

Which ETF is better, EPRF or PFFA?

On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 6.09% vs -2.09% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPRF or PFFA?

Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 6.09% return vs -2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPRF or PFFA?

EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPRF or PFFA?

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.79%, compared with 6.19% for EPRF.

What is the main difference between EPRF and PFFA?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 1.47% for PFFA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.