MTBA vs. IRONX
MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) and IRONX (Ironclad Managed Risk Fund) are both funds - MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify, while IRONX is a Options Trading fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past year, MTBA returned 5.18% vs 14.96% for IRONX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTBA charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for IRONX.
Performance
MTBA vs. IRONX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTBA achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than IRONX's 5.42% return.
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRONX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 26.84%
MTBA vs. IRONX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.23% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
IRONX Ironclad Managed Risk Fund | 5.42% | 10.57% | 14.78% | 4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTBA and IRONX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MTBA and IRONX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTBA vs. IRONX — Risk / Return Rank
MTBA
IRONX
MTBA vs. IRONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) and Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTBA | IRONX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.57 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 9.61 | -3.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTBA | IRONX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 1.89 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.57 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
MTBA vs. IRONX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTBA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum IRONX drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTBA and IRONX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTBA | IRONX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -13.71% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -5.99% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -0.07% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -1.78% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 1.60% | -0.77% |
Volatility
MTBA vs. IRONX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) is 1.33%, while Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that MTBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTBA | IRONX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 1.84% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | 5.96% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10% | 8.14% | -5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 9.45% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 40.76% | -36.81% |
MTBA vs. IRONX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTBA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IRONX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTBA vs. IRONX - Dividend Comparison
MTBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than IRONX's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRONX Ironclad Managed Risk Fund | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 5.17% | 2.97% | 13.84% | 4.16% | 121.75% | 8.85% | 9.93% | 1.42% | 0.38% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.09% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTBA and IRONX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRONX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to MTBA (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTBA dropped -3.48% vs IRONX's -13.71%.
IRONX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTBA and IRONX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer