MTB vs. SOXL
MTB (M&T Bank Corporation) is a stock, while SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ICE Semiconductor Index. Over the past 10 years, MTB returned 10.71%/yr vs 64.42%/yr for SOXL. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTB vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 446.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 10.71%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 64.42% annualized return.
MTB
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 26.34%
- 3Y*
- 30.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
SOXL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 20.47%
- YTD
- 446.21%
- 6M
- 419.27%
- 1Y
- 858.82%
- 3Y*
- 120.25%
- 5Y*
- 42.22%
- 10Y*
- 64.42%
MTB vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 17.39% | 10.89% | 41.66% | -1.68% | -2.94% | 24.28% | -22.16% | 21.65% | -14.58% | 11.35% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 446.21% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTB and SOXL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTB and SOXL has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTB vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
MTB
SOXL
MTB vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTB | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.56 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 19.95 | -18.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 63.67 | -60.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTB vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTB | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.50% | -90.46% | +16.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -43.47% | +26.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.20% | -87.88% | +59.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.71% | -90.46% | +49.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.97% | -90.46% | +37.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -23.67% | +23.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -34.95% | +22.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 13.60% | -6.39% |
Volatility
MTB vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) is 6.71%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.18%. This indicates that MTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTB | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 68.18% | -61.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 99.65% | -83.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 116.81% | -95.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.28% | 110.33% | -80.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 100.60% | -67.80% |
Dividends
MTB vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while SOXL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.57% | 3.24% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTB and SOXL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (68.18%) compared to MTB (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTB dropped -73.50% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.45 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTB and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer