MSOX vs. GK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSOX returned -66.81%/yr vs 15.30%/yr for GK. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GK.

Performance

MSOX vs. GK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -49.55% return, which is significantly lower than GK's 10.37% return.

MSOX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -27.56%
• 6M: -30.25%
• YTD: -49.55%
• 1Y: -44.33%
• 3Y*: -66.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -74.69%

GK

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -2.68%
• 6M: 9.07%
• YTD: 10.37%
• 1Y: 15.62%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	$30.57K	$31.19K	$45.15K
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	$3.60M	$4.46M	$7.39M

MSOX vs. GK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	-49.55%	-51.20%	-87.32%	-39.26%	-76.29%
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	10.37%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-17.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and GK is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	0.27

MSOX vs. GK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSOX	GK
Financial Services	184.5%	7.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.8%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	10.0%
Industrials	-	16.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	38.4%
Utilities	-	4.6%

Return for Risk

MSOX vs. GK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSOX

MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 18
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 29
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSOX vs. GK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSOX	GK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	0.70	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	1.11	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.13	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	0.91	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	3.11	-3.67

MSOX vs. GK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the GK Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and GK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. GK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than GK's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and GK.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOX	GK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.75%	-47.72%	-52.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.89%	-15.13%	-69.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.83%	-23.62%	-75.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.67%	-6.29%	-93.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.19%	-23.37%	-65.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	62.34%	4.44%	+57.90%

Volatility

MSOX vs. GK - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) at 7.00%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSOX	GK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.51%	7.00%	+18.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	110.30%	16.37%	+93.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	217.82%	19.76%	+198.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	166.50%	24.11%	+142.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	166.50%	24.00%	+142.50%

MSOX vs. GK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOX vs. GK - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOX and GK in my portfolio?

MSOX and GK have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSOX or GK?

MSOX has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to GK (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs GK's -47.72%.

Which ETF is better, MSOX or GK?

On 3-year performance, GK leads with 15.30% vs -66.81% for MSOX. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GK has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSOX or GK?

Over the 3-year period, GK has performed better with a 15.30% return vs -66.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOX or GK?

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOX or GK?

GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

What is the main difference between MSOX and GK?

MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GK is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.75% for GK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.