MSOX vs. CNBS
MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSOX returned -66.53%/yr vs -5.21%/yr for CNBS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNBS.
Performance
MSOX vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -37.05% return, which is significantly lower than CNBS's -3.21% return.
MSOX
- 1D
- 9.30%
- 1M
- -17.54%
- 6M
- -43.26%
- YTD
- -37.05%
- 1Y
- -29.50%
- 3Y*
- -66.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNBS
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 1Y
- 48.36%
- 3Y*
- -5.21%
- 5Y*
- -32.41%
- 10Y*
- —
MSOX vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -37.05% | -51.20% | -87.32% | -39.26% | -76.29% |
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | -3.21% | 15.33% | -29.41% | -16.11% | -28.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOX and CNBS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between MSOX and CNBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MSOX vs. CNBS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSOX
CNBS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MSOX
CNBS
Basic Materials
MSOX
-
CNBS
-
Communication Services
MSOX
-
CNBS
-
Consumer Cyclical
MSOX
-
CNBS
Consumer Defensive
MSOX
-
CNBS
Energy
MSOX
-
CNBS
-
Healthcare
MSOX
-
CNBS
Industrials
MSOX
-
CNBS
Real Estate
MSOX
-
CNBS
Technology
MSOX
-
CNBS
Utilities
MSOX
-
CNBS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOX vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank
MSOX
CNBS
MSOX vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOX | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.95 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 1.66 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOX vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, roughly equal to the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and CNBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOX | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.75% | -95.71% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -51.25% | -33.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.83% | -73.41% | -25.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.58% | -91.57% | -8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.04% | -71.52% | -17.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.62% | 29.30% | +30.32% |
Volatility
MSOX vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 33.52% compared to Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) at 15.71%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOX | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.52% | 15.71% | +17.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 112.31% | 53.18% | +59.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 220.61% | 105.84% | +114.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.49% | 65.23% | +102.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.49% | 61.28% | +106.21% |
MSOX vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CNBS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOX vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSOX nor CNBS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, MSOX and CNBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MSOX has higher volatility (33.52%) compared to CNBS (15.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs CNBS's -95.71%.
On 3-year performance, CNBS leads with -5.21% vs -66.53% for MSOX. On fees, CNBS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CNBS has been the lower-risk option at 15.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CNBS has performed better with a -5.21% return vs -66.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CNBS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.
MSOX and CNBS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CNBS is Cannabis. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.75% for CNBS.
CNBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSOX and CNBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer