MSOX vs. YOLO
MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSOX returned -66.81%/yr vs -1.05%/yr for YOLO. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for YOLO.
Performance
MSOX vs. YOLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -49.55% return, which is significantly lower than YOLO's -23.04% return.
MSOX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -27.56%
- 6M
- -30.25%
- YTD
- -49.55%
- 1Y
- -44.33%
- 3Y*
- -66.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -74.69%
YOLO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -13.02%
- 6M
- -12.42%
- YTD
- -23.04%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- -1.05%
- 5Y*
- -31.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.60M | $4.46M | $7.39M | |
| $65.57K | $75.89K | $99.07K |
MSOX vs. YOLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -49.55% | -51.20% | -87.32% | -39.26% | -76.29% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -23.04% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -33.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOX and YOLO is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MSOX and YOLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
MSOX vs. YOLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSOX
YOLO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MSOX
YOLO
Basic Materials
MSOX
-
YOLO
-
Communication Services
MSOX
-
YOLO
-
Consumer Cyclical
MSOX
-
YOLO
Consumer Defensive
MSOX
-
YOLO
Energy
MSOX
-
YOLO
-
Healthcare
MSOX
-
YOLO
Industrials
MSOX
-
YOLO
-
Real Estate
MSOX
-
YOLO
Technology
MSOX
-
YOLO
-
Utilities
MSOX
-
YOLO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOX vs. YOLO — Risk / Return Rank
MSOX
YOLO
MSOX vs. YOLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOX | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.44 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 0.70 | -1.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOX vs. YOLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than YOLO's maximum drawdown of -94.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and YOLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOX | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.75% | -94.68% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -41.57% | -43.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.83% | -66.45% | -32.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.67% | -91.00% | -8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.19% | -69.37% | -19.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.34% | 25.76% | +36.58% |
Volatility
MSOX vs. YOLO - Volatility Comparison
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) at 13.99%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YOLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOX | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.51% | 13.99% | +11.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 110.30% | 39.12% | +71.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 217.82% | 75.11% | +142.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 166.50% | 53.97% | +112.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 166.50% | 51.23% | +115.27% |
MSOX vs. YOLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than YOLO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOX vs. YOLO - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSOX nor YOLO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOX and YOLO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOX has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to YOLO (13.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs YOLO's -94.68%.
On 3-year performance, YOLO leads with -1.05% vs -66.81% for MSOX. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YOLO has been the lower-risk option at 13.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, YOLO has performed better with a -1.05% return vs -66.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.
MSOX and YOLO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YOLO is Cannabis. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.75% for YOLO.
YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSOX and YOLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer