MSFW vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. MSFW is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

MSFW vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.

MSFW

• 1D: -3.61%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: -14.73%
• 6M: -13.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	-14.73%	-7.81%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and QYLD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.42

MSFW vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFW	QYLD
Technology	31.6%	53.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

MSFW vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFW	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.76	0.59	-1.35

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFW	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.42%	-24.75%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.27%	-0.06%	-26.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.45%	-3.84%	-13.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFW	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.40%	8.58%	+23.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.40%	14.70%	+17.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.40%	15.49%	+16.91%

MSFW vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFW vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	39.31%	20.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFW and QYLD in my portfolio?

MSFW and QYLD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSFW or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFW or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFW or QYLD?

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between MSFW and QYLD?

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.60% for QYLD.