PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than MAGX's 1.49% return.


MSFW

1D
-3.61%
1M
4.05%
YTD
-14.73%
6M
-13.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGX

1D
-2.59%
1M
3.29%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.41%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and MAGX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.53

MSFW vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFW
MAGX

Technology

31.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

25.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MSFW
31.6%
MAGX

-

Basic Materials

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Communication Services

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Cyclical

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Defensive

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Energy

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Financial Services

MSFW

-

MAGX
25.0%

Healthcare

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Industrials

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Real Estate

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Utilities

MSFW

-

MAGX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFW

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFW vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFWMAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

0.85

-1.61

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum MAGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and MAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-54.19%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.27%

-7.49%

-18.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-13.78%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

Volatility

MSFW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.40%

39.88%

-7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.40%

53.52%

-21.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

53.52%

-21.12%

MSFW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than MAGX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
2.02%2.05%0.86%
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
39.31%20.25%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFW and MAGX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.95% for MAGX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and MAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer