PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSFW

1D
1.71%
1M
1.75%
6M
-15.87%
YTD
-21.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
-8.82%
1M
-23.17%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and DRAM is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

-0.18

MSFW vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFW
DRAM

Technology

32.7%
58.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-2.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MSFW
32.7%
DRAM
58.3%

Basic Materials

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Communication Services

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Cyclical

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Defensive

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Energy

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Financial Services

MSFW

-

DRAM
-2.3%

Healthcare

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Industrials

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Real Estate

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Utilities

MSFW

-

DRAM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFW vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-35.16%

-6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.08%

-35.16%

+3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.41%

-6.83%

-12.58%

Volatility

MSFW vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWDRAMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.58%

97.73%

-64.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.58%

97.73%

-64.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.58%

97.73%

-64.15%

MSFW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.07%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
48.07%20.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFW and DRAM have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 48.07%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer