MSFW vs. CRSH
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSFW vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 3.14% return.
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- -18.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -14.73% | -7.81% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.14% | -25.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and CRSH is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
MSFW
CRSH
MSFW vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFW | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | -0.71 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -63.68% | +23.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.27% | -59.42% | +33.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -43.11% | +25.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.14% | — |
Volatility
MSFW vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.40% | 36.72% | -4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 47.50% | -15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 47.50% | -15.10% |
MSFW vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSFW and CRSH have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSFW vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, less than CRSH's 96.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 96.17% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 39.31% | 20.25% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFW and CRSH have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFW and CRSH have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 39.31% for MSFW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer