MSFW vs. BUCK
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
MSFW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -21.45% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.42% return.
MSFW
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- -15.87%
- YTD
- -21.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -21.45% | -7.80% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 2.42% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and BUCK is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
MSFW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BUCK
MSFW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.62 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 42.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -5.43% | -36.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.08% | -0.02% | -32.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.41% | -0.48% | -18.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
MSFW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.58% | 2.74% | +30.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.58% | 3.44% | +30.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.58% | 3.44% | +30.14% |
MSFW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.07%, more than BUCK's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.29% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 48.07% | 20.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFW and BUCK have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.
MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 48.07%, compared with 7.29% for BUCK.
MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer