PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.


MSFW

1D
-3.61%
1M
4.05%
YTD
-14.73%
6M
-13.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
-14.73%-7.81%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and BUCK is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

-0.04

MSFW vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFW
BUCK

Technology

31.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MSFW
31.6%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Communication Services

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Energy

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Financial Services

MSFW

-

BUCK
100.0%

Healthcare

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Industrials

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Real Estate

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Utilities

MSFW

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFW

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFW vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFWBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

1.47

-2.23

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-5.43%

-34.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.27%

-0.04%

-26.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-0.49%

-16.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

MSFW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.40%

3.14%

+29.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.40%

3.49%

+28.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

3.49%

+28.91%

MSFW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
39.31%20.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFW and BUCK have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer