MSFD vs. NVDQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ).

MSFD and NVDQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSFD is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). It was launched on Sep 6, 2022. NVDQ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Oct 18, 2023.

Performance

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	28.73%	-13.36%	-7.86%	-11.28%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	4.46%	-74.63%	-93.80%	-30.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a 28.73% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's 4.46% return.

MSFD

• 1D: -3.15%
• 1M: 6.11%
• YTD: 28.73%
• 6M: 38.42%
• 1Y: -0.32%
• 3Y*: -7.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDQ

• 1D: -11.16%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 4.46%
• 6M: -4.52%
• 1Y: -76.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.

MSFD

Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares

NVDQ

T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF

Return for Risk

MSFD vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFD

MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 12
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 12

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFD	NVDQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	-0.93	+0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	-1.69	+1.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.79	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	-0.90	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.03	-1.02	+1.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFD Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFD and NVDQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFD	NVDQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	-0.93	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.39	-0.87	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between MSFD and NVDQ is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than NVDQ's 0.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	2.43%	3.33%	4.46%	4.43%	0.74%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.25%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and NVDQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFD	NVDQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.90%	-99.13%	+39.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.84%	-85.00%	+50.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.94%	-98.94%	+57.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.28%	-87.41%	+46.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.22%	74.44%	-49.22%

Volatility

MSFD vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) is 6.60%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a volatility of 20.96%. This indicates that MSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFD	NVDQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	20.96%	-14.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.84%	51.99%	-33.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.78%	82.28%	-55.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.77%	96.83%	-71.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.77%	96.83%	-71.06%