MSFD vs. OILD
MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) and OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds - MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%) while OILD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSFD returned -8.15%/yr vs -47.52%/yr for OILD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OILD.
Performance
MSFD vs. OILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly higher than OILD's -59.89% return.
MSFD
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILD
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- -59.89%
- 6M
- -59.58%
- 1Y
- -72.54%
- 3Y*
- -47.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFD vs. OILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 6.94% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -35.90% | 3.88% |
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -59.89% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -19.58% | -40.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFD and OILD is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.07 |
The correlation between MSFD and OILD shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFD vs. OILD — Risk / Return Rank
MSFD
OILD
MSFD vs. OILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFD | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | -1.19 | +1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | -2.45 | +2.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.75 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.95 | +1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | -1.59 | +1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFD | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | -1.19 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.75 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
MSFD vs. OILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum OILD drawdown of -98.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and OILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFD | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.90% | -98.90% | +39.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.25% | -77.40% | +54.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.50% | -88.53% | +48.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.77% | -98.70% | +46.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -88.63% | +47.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 46.36% | -37.92% |
Volatility
MSFD vs. OILD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) is 9.49%, while MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) has a volatility of 24.14%. This indicates that MSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFD | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.49% | 24.14% | -14.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.86% | 48.51% | -26.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.12% | 61.17% | -36.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.11% | 79.41% | -53.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.11% | 79.41% | -53.30% |
MSFD vs. OILD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than OILD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFD vs. OILD - Dividend Comparison
MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while OILD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 2.92% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFD and OILD have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILD has higher volatility (24.14%) compared to MSFD (9.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs OILD's -98.90%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -8.15% vs -47.52% for OILD. On fees, OILD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MSFD has been the lower-risk option at 9.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -8.15% return vs -47.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.00% for OILD.
MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%), while OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 0.95% for OILD.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFD and OILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer