MSFD vs. MUD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) and MUD (Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. MSFD is passively managed, while MUD is actively managed. Over the past year, MSFD returned 26.45% vs -92.90% for MUD. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MUD.

Performance

MSFD vs. MUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFD achieves a 24.19% return, which is significantly higher than MUD's -80.97% return.

MSFD

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: 9.58%
• YTD: 24.19%
• 6M: 25.23%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: -3.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUD

• 1D: 12.55%
• 1M: -38.07%
• YTD: -80.97%
• 6M: -81.60%
• 1Y: -92.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFD vs. MUD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	24.19%	-13.36%	-0.61%
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares	-80.97%	-78.75%	19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFD and MUD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	0.25

The correlation between MSFD and MUD shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSFD vs. MUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFD

MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 29
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MUD

MUD Risk / Return Rank: 0
MUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MUD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFD vs. MUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFD	MUD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	-1.28	+2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	-3.88	+5.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.58	+0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	-0.98	+2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	-1.44	+5.13

MSFD vs. MUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the MUD Sharpe Ratio of -1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFD and MUD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFD vs. MUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, smaller than the maximum MUD drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and MUD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFD	MUD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.90%	-96.89%	+36.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.25%	-94.52%	+71.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.99%	-96.50%	+52.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.61%	-51.61%	+10.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.35%	64.29%	-56.94%

Volatility

MSFD vs. MUD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) is 11.74%, while Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) has a volatility of 38.19%. This indicates that MSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFD	MUD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	38.19%	-26.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.81%	62.00%	-39.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.33%	72.50%	-46.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.27%	69.99%	-43.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.27%	69.99%	-43.72%

MSFD vs. MUD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MUD's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFD vs. MUD - Dividend Comparison

MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than MUD's 30.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	2.52%	3.33%	4.46%	4.43%	0.74%
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares	30.97%	9.21%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFD and MUD in my portfolio?

MSFD and MUD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFD or MUD?

MUD has higher volatility (38.19%) compared to MSFD (11.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs MUD's -96.89%.

Which ETF is better, MSFD or MUD?

On 1-year performance, MSFD leads with 26.45% vs -92.90% for MUD. On fees, MUD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, MSFD has been the lower-risk option at 11.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFD or MUD?

Over the 1-year period, MSFD has performed better with a 26.45% return vs -92.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFD or MUD?

MUD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFD or MUD?

MUD has the higher dividend yield at 30.97%, compared with 2.52% for MSFD.

What is the main difference between MSFD and MUD?

Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 0.97% for MUD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.