PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MS vs. FEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MS vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley (MS) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MS achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MS has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 27.71%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.


MS

1D
0.65%
1M
11.18%
YTD
21.88%
6M
21.28%
1Y
69.28%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
27.71%

FEZ

1D
0.09%
1M
6.20%
YTD
7.29%
6M
8.07%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MS vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MS
Morgan Stanley
21.88%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
7.29%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MS and FEZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002

0.58

The correlation between MS and FEZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MS vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MS vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley (MS) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.17

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

1.29

+2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

4.40

+7.25

MS vs. FEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the FEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MS and FEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MS vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MS drawdown since its inception was -88.12%, which is greater than FEZ's maximum drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MS and FEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.12%

-64.21%

-23.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.83%

-13.63%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-15.85%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.38%

-35.05%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-39.69%

-11.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-0.37%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-17.05%

-16.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

4.01%

+1.69%

Volatility

MS vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley (MS) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 6.57%. This indicates that MS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

6.57%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.46%

15.48%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.81%

18.45%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.75%

20.70%

+8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

21.11%

+10.40%

Dividends

MS vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison

MS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than FEZ's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.52%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.87%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


MS and FEZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MS has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to FEZ (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MS dropped -88.12% vs FEZ's -64.21%.

MS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MS and FEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer