PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRVL vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRVL vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 229.54% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's 30.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has outperformed MAR with an annualized return of 40.68%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively lower 21.03% annualized return.


MRVL

1D
-0.36%
1M
58.12%
YTD
229.54%
6M
231.70%
1Y
317.41%
3Y*
64.86%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
40.68%

MAR

1D
1.42%
1M
14.20%
YTD
30.26%
6M
35.28%
1Y
59.26%
3Y*
31.68%
5Y*
23.91%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVL vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
229.54%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
30.26%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVL and MAR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000

0.37

The correlation between MRVL and MAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MRVL:

$2.90

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

MRVL:

96.58

MAR:

31.80

PEG Ratio

MRVL:

0.18

MAR:

0.83

PS Ratio

MRVL:

27.99

MAR:

3.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRVL:

$8.72B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.41B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.27B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRVL vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVL vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRVLMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.57

4.31

+7.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.42

10.89

+15.53

MRVL vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVL Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is higher than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVL and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRVL vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRVLMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.60%

-75.59%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.36%

-12.65%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.79%

-30.50%

-30.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.88%

-30.50%

-31.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

-61.26%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.61%

0.00%

-11.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.74%

-14.90%

-31.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

5.01%

+6.51%

Volatility

MRVL vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 40.61% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.92%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRVLMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.61%

6.92%

+33.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.42%

19.94%

+35.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.94%

26.32%

+44.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.82%

28.84%

+32.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.94%

32.90%

+19.04%

Dividends

MRVL vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MAR's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.68%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

MRVL vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
2.42B
1.81B
(MRVL) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MRVL and MAR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to MAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRVL and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer