MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO).
Performance
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology Group Ltd. | 25.66% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -47.43% |
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR | -7.44% | 41.29% | 146.06% | 241.35% | -50.46% |
Different Trading Currencies
MRVL is traded in USD, while NVDA.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NVDA.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
MRVL:
$91.37B
NVDA.NEO:
CA$963.21B
MRVL:
$3.08
NVDA.NEO:
CA$4.07
MRVL:
34.69
NVDA.NEO:
9.73
MRVL:
11.30
NVDA.NEO:
5.16
MRVL:
6.39
NVDA.NEO:
8.10
MRVL:
$8.19B
NVDA.NEO:
CA$187.14B
MRVL:
$4.18B
NVDA.NEO:
CA$131.09B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 25.66% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA.NEO's -7.44% return.
MRVL
- 1D
- 7.73%
- 1M
- 31.97%
- YTD
- 25.66%
- 6M
- 27.38%
- 1Y
- 70.84%
- 3Y*
- 35.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.00%
- 10Y*
- 27.79%
NVDA.NEO
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -7.44%
- 6M
- -7.08%
- 1Y
- 60.46%
- 3Y*
- 79.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
MRVL
NVDA.NEO
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRVL | NVDA.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 2.25 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.08 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 8.16 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRVL | NVDA.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.98 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVL and NVDA.NEO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Dividend Comparison
MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than NVDA.NEO's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology Group Ltd. | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than NVDA.NEO's maximum drawdown of -65.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and NVDA.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVL | NVDA.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.60% | -61.15% | -30.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.36% | -21.04% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.07% | -16.13% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.08% | -15.99% | -31.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.14% | 8.44% | +3.70% |
Volatility
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 25.89% compared to NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) at 10.31%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MRVL | NVDA.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.89% | 10.31% | +15.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.29% | 25.37% | +15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.58% | 40.54% | +24.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.45% | 53.79% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.97% | 53.79% | -3.82% |
Financials
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology Group Ltd. and NVIDIA Corporation CDR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRVL vs. NVDA.NEO - Profitability Comparison
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 2.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.
NVDA.NEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a gross profit of 41.85B and revenue of 57.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.4%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 404.40M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
NVDA.NEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported an operating income of 36.01B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 63.2%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a net income of 396.10M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
NVDA.NEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a net income of 31.91B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in a net margin of 56.0%.