PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSH vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRSH vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSH achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MRSH has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 11.56%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.30% annualized return.


MRSH

1D
-1.48%
1M
3.19%
YTD
-9.50%
6M
-10.36%
1Y
-22.08%
3Y*
-1.27%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
11.56%

VUG

1D
2.81%
1M
0.27%
YTD
7.94%
6M
9.17%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
18.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRSH vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc
-9.50%-11.26%13.75%16.15%-3.45%50.83%6.86%42.33%-0.14%22.73%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
7.94%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MRSH and VUG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.53

The correlation between MRSH and VUG shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRSH vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSH
MRSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSH vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRSHVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.28

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.60

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

5.50

-6.92

MRSH vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSH and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRSH vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSH drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSH and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSHVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.46%

-50.68%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.01%

-16.53%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.36%

-22.85%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.36%

-35.61%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.80%

-35.61%

-0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.66%

-2.90%

-27.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-7.09%

-10.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.56%

4.79%

+10.77%

Volatility

MRSH vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 6.32%. This indicates that MRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRSHVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

6.32%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.09%

13.28%

+5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.52%

16.65%

+6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.21%

22.34%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

21.51%

-0.56%

Dividends

MRSH vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

MRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than VUG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc
2.17%1.85%1.44%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.38%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRSH and VUG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRSH has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to VUG (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSH dropped -67.46% vs VUG's -50.68%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRSH and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer