PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRAM vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRAM vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 130.60% return, which is significantly higher than VLUE's 44.95% return.


MRAM

1D
-5.10%
1M
-36.46%
YTD
130.60%
6M
130.11%
1Y
245.16%
3Y*
37.73%
5Y*
26.30%
10Y*

VLUE

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.34%
YTD
44.95%
6M
43.41%
1Y
78.89%
3Y*
32.40%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRAM vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRAM
Everspin Technologies, Inc.
130.60%45.23%-29.31%62.59%-50.80%145.65%-12.55%-6.24%-25.20%-9.53%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
44.95%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MRAM and VLUE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016

0.39

The correlation between MRAM and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRAM vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRAM
MRAM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MRAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MRAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRAM vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRAMVLUEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.71

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

8.77

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

36.50

-26.47

MRAM vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAM and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRAM vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRAMVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.28%

-39.47%

-51.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.37%

-9.04%

-42.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.89%

-17.89%

-40.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.02%

-27.12%

-39.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.37%

-3.69%

-47.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-6.00%

-58.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.56%

2.17%

+22.39%

Volatility

MRAM vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) has a higher volatility of 37.74% compared to iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) at 9.72%. This indicates that MRAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRAMVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.74%

9.72%

+28.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.34%

16.12%

+75.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.61%

19.07%

+88.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.98%

18.12%

+58.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.69%

19.94%

+58.75%

Dividends

MRAM vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

MRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRAM
Everspin Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.42%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRAM and VLUE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRAM has higher volatility (37.74%) compared to VLUE (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRAM and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer