MRAM vs. DRAM
MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRAM vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRAM
- 1D
- -11.67%
- 1M
- -33.05%
- YTD
- 143.00%
- 6M
- 140.41%
- 1Y
- 272.11%
- 3Y*
- 40.16%
- 5Y*
- 27.55%
- 10Y*
- —
DRAM
- 1D
- -14.25%
- 1M
- 31.05%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRAM vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc. | 145.11% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 156.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRAM and DRAM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRAM vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank
MRAM
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MRAM vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRAM | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRAM vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRAM | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -19.97% | -71.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.76% | -14.25% | -34.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.90% | -3.09% | -61.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.34% | — | — |
Volatility
MRAM vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRAM | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 91.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.46% | 93.22% | +14.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.98% | 93.22% | -16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.69% | 93.22% | -14.53% |
Dividends
MRAM vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRAM nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRAM and DRAM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MRAM and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer