MRAM vs. VOO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, MRAM returned 24.54%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for VOO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MRAM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 82.44% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.45% return.

MRAM

• 1D: -8.09%
• 1M: -30.64%
• 6M: 48.90%
• YTD: 82.44%
• 1Y: 151.19%
• 3Y*: 21.71%
• 5Y*: 24.54%
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.25%
• 6M: 8.34%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 20.16%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRAM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc.	82.44%	45.23%	-29.31%	62.59%	-50.80%	145.65%	-12.55%	-6.24%	-25.20%	-9.53%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.45%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MRAM and VOO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016	0.41

The correlation between MRAM and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MRAM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRAM

MRAM Risk / Return Rank: 84
MRAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
MRAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
MRAM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MRAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MRAM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 66
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRAM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRAM	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.73	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.39	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	2.43	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	10.60	-5.03

MRAM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MRAM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRAM	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.28%	-33.99%	-57.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.53%	-8.90%	-52.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.53%	-18.69%	-42.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.02%	-24.52%	-42.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.53%	-1.11%	-60.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.84%	-3.68%	-61.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.28%	2.04%	+25.24%

Volatility

MRAM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) has a higher volatility of 32.89% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.16%. This indicates that MRAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRAM	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.89%	4.16%	+28.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	93.23%	9.97%	+83.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.06%	12.53%	+97.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.58%	16.93%	+60.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.85%	18.00%	+60.85%

Dividends

MRAM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.07%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRAM and VOO in my portfolio?

MRAM and VOO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRAM or VOO?

MRAM has higher volatility (32.89%) compared to VOO (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.