MRAM vs. MXL
MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.) and MXL (MaxLinear, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, MRAM returned 25.52%/yr vs 6.85%/yr for MXL. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MRAM vs. MXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 87.72% return, which is significantly lower than MXL's 317.21% return.
MRAM
- 1D
- 12.75%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- 6M
- 58.51%
- YTD
- 87.72%
- 1Y
- 183.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 25.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.83%
MXL
- 1D
- 8.36%
- 1M
- -21.91%
- 6M
- 329.28%
- YTD
- 317.21%
- 1Y
- 376.85%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.53M | $18.78M | $103.28M | |
| $367.64M | $311.72M | $391.91M |
MRAM vs. MXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc. | 87.72% | 45.23% | -29.31% | 62.59% | -50.80% | 145.65% | -12.55% | -6.24% | -25.20% | -9.53% |
MXL MaxLinear, Inc. | 317.21% | -11.88% | -16.79% | -29.99% | -54.97% | 97.41% | 79.97% | 20.57% | -33.38% | 21.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRAM and MXL is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016 | 0.41 |
The correlation between MRAM and MXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MRAM:
$408.46M
MXL:
$6.60B
MRAM:
$0.01
MXL:
-$1.18
MRAM:
7.15
MXL:
11.21
MRAM:
5.74
MXL:
13.32
MRAM:
$56.94M
MXL:
$568.93M
MRAM:
$29.33M
MXL:
$326.66M
MRAM:
-$3.33M
MXL:
-$47.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRAM vs. MXL — Risk / Return Rank
MRAM
MXL
MRAM vs. MXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRAM | MXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.50 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 6.87 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 24.13 | -18.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRAM vs. MXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, roughly equal to the maximum MXL drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and MXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRAM | MXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -88.13% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.62% | -55.28% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.62% | -63.95% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.62% | -88.13% | +17.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.42% | -43.20% | -17.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.84% | -44.87% | -19.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.64% | 15.71% | +15.93% |
Volatility
MRAM vs. MXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) is 32.39%, while MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) has a volatility of 44.78%. This indicates that MRAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRAM | MXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.39% | 44.78% | -12.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.96% | 99.19% | -5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.12% | 120.05% | -6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.48% | 80.71% | -2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.12% | 68.03% | +11.09% |
Dividends
MRAM vs. MXL - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRAM nor MXL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MRAM vs. MXL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everspin Technologies, Inc. and MaxLinear, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRAM vs. MXL - Profitability Comparison
MRAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everspin Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.84M and revenue of 14.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
MXL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a gross profit of 97.66M and revenue of 168.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.
MRAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everspin Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.72M and revenue of 14.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.3%.
MXL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.19M and revenue of 168.85M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.5%.
MRAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everspin Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -290.00K and revenue of 14.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.
MXL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a net income of 1.76M and revenue of 168.85M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRAM and MXL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXL has higher volatility (44.78%) compared to MRAM (32.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs MXL's -88.13%.
MXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRAM and MXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer