MRAM vs. SPYV
MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. Over the past 5 years, MRAM returned 37.98%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for SPYV. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRAM vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 224.46% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.85% return.
MRAM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 40.11%
- YTD
- 224.46%
- 6M
- 267.20%
- 1Y
- 439.61%
- 3Y*
- 52.14%
- 5Y*
- 37.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
MRAM vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc. | 224.46% | 45.23% | -29.31% | 62.59% | -50.80% | 145.65% | -12.55% | -6.24% | -25.20% | -9.53% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.85% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRAM and SPYV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRAM vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
MRAM
SPYV
MRAM vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRAM | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.27 | 2.28 | +1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.05 | 3.19 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.41 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.87 | 3.65 | +5.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.69 | 14.04 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRAM | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | 2.28 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.76 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.42 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
MRAM vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRAM | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -58.45% | -32.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.25% | -6.22% | -43.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.89% | -17.54% | -40.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.02% | -17.89% | -49.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.58% | -0.21% | -31.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.70% | -8.72% | -55.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.18% | 1.62% | +20.56% |
Volatility
MRAM vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) has a higher volatility of 60.48% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.07%. This indicates that MRAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRAM | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 60.48% | 2.07% | +58.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.91% | 7.05% | +79.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.83% | 9.84% | +93.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.07% | 14.39% | +61.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.30% | 16.94% | +61.36% |
Dividends
MRAM vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
MRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.69% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRAM and SPYV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRAM has higher volatility (60.48%) compared to SPYV (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
MRAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRAM and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer