PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTO vs. TIME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTO vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 7.94% return.


MOTO

1D
1.41%
1M
-0.75%
6M
9.06%
YTD
17.24%
1Y
34.06%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.32%

TIME

1D
1.18%
1M
1.28%
6M
7.90%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.22K$15.41K$15.45K
$51.24K$43.99K$100.40K

MOTO vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
17.24%27.38%-4.27%
TIME
Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF
7.94%10.17%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTO and TIME is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

0.73

The correlation between MOTO and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTO vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTO
TIME

Technology

43.0%
45.5%

Consumer Cyclical

23.7%
6.1%

Industrials

15.3%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
15.6%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
5.5%

Financial Services

1.0%
3.6%

Utilities

0.7%
1.6%

Energy

-

6.8%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

MOTO
43.0%
TIME
45.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTO
23.7%
TIME
6.1%

Industrials

MOTO
15.3%
TIME
5.3%

Communication Services

MOTO
4.4%
TIME
15.6%

Basic Materials

MOTO
3.8%
TIME
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOTO
2.3%
TIME
5.5%

Financial Services

MOTO
1.0%
TIME
3.6%

Utilities

MOTO
0.7%
TIME
1.6%

Energy

MOTO

-

TIME
6.8%

Healthcare

MOTO

-

TIME
6.8%

Real Estate

MOTO

-

TIME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTO vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTO
MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTO vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOTOTIMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.34

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

4.58

+1.88

MOTO vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTO and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTO vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and TIME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTOTIMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.24%

-24.26%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.07%

-13.09%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.85%

-2.43%

-8.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-5.44%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

3.83%

+1.46%

Volatility

MOTO vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) at 4.07%. This indicates that MOTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTOTIMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

4.07%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

11.18%

+9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.52%

14.25%

+10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.25%

17.55%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.51%

17.55%

+8.96%

MOTO vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTO vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than TIME's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
0.90%1.06%1.07%2.73%2.33%0.55%2.71%
TIME
Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF
9.28%10.02%15.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTO and TIME have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOTO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to TIME (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs TIME's -24.26%.

On 1-year performance, MOTO leads with 34.06% vs 17.48% for TIME. On fees, MOTO is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 34.06% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOTO is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.28%, compared with 0.90% for MOTO.

They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Clockwise. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 1.00% for TIME.

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTO and TIME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer