MOTO vs. TIME
MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and TIME (Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MOTO returned 34.06% vs 17.48% for TIME. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
MOTO vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 7.94% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.32%
TIME
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.22K | $15.41K | $15.45K | |
| $51.24K | $43.99K | $100.40K |
MOTO vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 17.24% | 27.38% | -4.27% |
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF | 7.94% | 10.17% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and TIME is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MOTO and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
MOTO vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTO
TIME
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
MOTO
TIME
Consumer Cyclical
MOTO
TIME
Industrials
MOTO
TIME
Communication Services
MOTO
TIME
Basic Materials
MOTO
TIME
Consumer Defensive
MOTO
TIME
Financial Services
MOTO
TIME
Utilities
MOTO
TIME
Energy
MOTO
-
TIME
Healthcare
MOTO
-
TIME
Real Estate
MOTO
-
TIME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
TIME
MOTO vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTO | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.34 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 4.58 | +1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -24.26% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -13.09% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -2.43% | -8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -5.44% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 3.83% | +1.46% |
Volatility
MOTO vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) at 4.07%. This indicates that MOTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 4.07% | +4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 11.18% | +9.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 14.25% | +10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 17.55% | +6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 17.55% | +8.96% |
MOTO vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTO vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than TIME's 9.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.90% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% |
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF | 9.28% | 10.02% | 15.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTO and TIME have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOTO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to TIME (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs TIME's -24.26%.
On 1-year performance, MOTO leads with 34.06% vs 17.48% for TIME. On fees, MOTO is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 34.06% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOTO is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.28%, compared with 0.90% for MOTO.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Clockwise. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 1.00% for TIME.
MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTO and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer