MOTO vs. FTEC
MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MOTO is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTO returned 7.58%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for FTEC. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
MOTO vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 22.53% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.32%
FTEC
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 29.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 23.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.23M | $78.73M | $94.95M | |
| $14.22K | $15.41K | $15.45K |
MOTO vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 17.24% | 27.38% | 2.01% | 27.10% | -27.20% | 17.22% | 59.13% | 5.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 22.53% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 6.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and FTEC is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between MOTO and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
MOTO vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTO
FTEC
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
MOTO
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
MOTO
FTEC
Industrials
MOTO
FTEC
Communication Services
MOTO
FTEC
Basic Materials
MOTO
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
MOTO
FTEC
-
Financial Services
MOTO
FTEC
Utilities
MOTO
FTEC
-
Energy
MOTO
-
FTEC
Healthcare
MOTO
-
FTEC
-
Real Estate
MOTO
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
FTEC
MOTO vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTO | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.32 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 6.23 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -34.95% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -16.26% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | -27.30% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -34.95% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -8.48% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -5.59% | -4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 6.04% | -0.75% |
Volatility
MOTO vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) have volatilities of 8.50% and 8.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 8.41% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 20.16% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 24.30% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 25.89% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 24.99% | +1.52% |
MOTO vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTO vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.90% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTO and FTEC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOTO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to FTEC (8.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 5-year performance, FTEC leads with 18.32% vs 7.58% for MOTO. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.
MOTO has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTO and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer