FTEC vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
FTEC and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both FTEC and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTEC or QQQM.
Performance
FTEC vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 27.41% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 23.51% return.
FTEC
27.41%
1.00%
13.76%
34.77%
22.67%
20.46%
QQQM
23.51%
1.58%
10.79%
30.54%
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
FTEC | QQQM | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.59 | 1.72 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.12 | 2.30 |
Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.31 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.20 | 2.20 |
Martin Ratio | 7.91 | 7.99 |
Ulcer Index | 4.25% | 3.73% |
Daily Std Dev | 21.11% | 17.35% |
Max Drawdown | -34.95% | -35.05% |
Current Drawdown | -2.02% | -2.13% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTEC vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FTEC and QQQM is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTEC vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FTEC vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than QQQM's 0.65% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.62% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.09% | 0.18% |
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.65% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FTEC vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FTEC vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 5.65%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.