MOTI vs. ICOW
MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - MOTI tracks the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index while ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTI returned 1.61%/yr vs 8.62%/yr for ICOW. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTI charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
MOTI vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -10.36% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 8.24% return.
MOTI
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -10.04%
- 1Y
- -1.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MOTI vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | -10.36% | 25.01% | 1.94% | 10.18% | -6.93% | 0.03% | 7.24% | 17.63% | -13.92% | 11.72% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.24% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTI and ICOW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MOTI and ICOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOTI vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTI
ICOW
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
MOTI
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
MOTI
ICOW
Healthcare
MOTI
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
MOTI
ICOW
Technology
MOTI
ICOW
Basic Materials
MOTI
ICOW
Communication Services
MOTI
ICOW
Financial Services
MOTI
ICOW
-
Energy
MOTI
-
ICOW
Real Estate
MOTI
-
ICOW
-
Utilities
MOTI
-
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTI vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
MOTI
ICOW
MOTI vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTI | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 3.20 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 10.66 | -10.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTI vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTI | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.70% | -43.49% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -8.35% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -14.81% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.77% | -27.79% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.61% | -8.35% | -7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -7.56% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 2.50% | +4.01% |
Volatility
MOTI vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) is 3.06%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that MOTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTI | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 5.83% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 11.91% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 14.75% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 16.77% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 18.50% | -0.68% |
MOTI vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTI vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than ICOW's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.36% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.60% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTI and ICOW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to MOTI (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 8.62% vs 1.61% for MOTI. On fees, MOTI is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 8.62% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOTI is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 2.36% for ICOW.
MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTI and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer