PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTI vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTI vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -6.91% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.


MOTI

1D
-1.03%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
-6.91%
6M
-5.79%
1Y
3.14%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
6.07%

ICOW

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.47%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.06%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTI vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
-6.91%25.01%1.94%10.18%-6.93%0.03%7.24%17.63%-13.92%11.46%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%17.91%-16.09%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTI and ICOW is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.78

The correlation between MOTI and ICOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTI vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTI
ICOW

Consumer Defensive

23.4%
8.5%

Industrials

22.2%
28.7%

Healthcare

15.1%
7.1%

Technology

10.5%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
11.6%

Communication Services

9.3%
8.9%

Basic Materials

5.8%
5.4%

Financial Services

3.2%

-

Energy

-

23.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

MOTI
23.4%
ICOW
8.5%

Industrials

MOTI
22.2%
ICOW
28.7%

Healthcare

MOTI
15.1%
ICOW
7.1%

Technology

MOTI
10.5%
ICOW
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTI
10.3%
ICOW
11.6%

Communication Services

MOTI
9.3%
ICOW
8.9%

Basic Materials

MOTI
5.8%
ICOW
5.4%

Financial Services

MOTI
3.2%
ICOW

-

Energy

MOTI

-

ICOW
23.7%

Real Estate

MOTI

-

ICOW

-

Utilities

MOTI

-

ICOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTI vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTI
MOTI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MOTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTI vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOTIICOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.50

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

4.91

-4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

17.54

-16.98

MOTI vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTI and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOTIICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

2.87

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.61

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.55

-0.29

Drawdowns

MOTI vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTIICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-43.49%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-8.02%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-14.81%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.14%

-28.48%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-0.64%

-11.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-7.59%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

2.24%

+3.46%

Volatility

MOTI vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) have volatilities of 4.32% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTIICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

4.41%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

10.59%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

13.73%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

16.64%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

18.47%

-0.39%

MOTI vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTI vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than ICOW's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.12%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%0.00%0.00%
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
3.46%3.22%4.79%2.34%3.27%4.67%2.14%3.90%3.73%8.87%1.33%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTI and ICOW have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOW has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to MOTI (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 1.78% for MOTI. On fees, MOTI is cheaper at 0.57% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOTI is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.

MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTI and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer