MOTI vs. ACWX
MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) and ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - MOTI tracks the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index while ACWX tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOTI returned 6.42%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for ACWX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOTI charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWX.
Performance
MOTI vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -7.14% return, which is significantly lower than ACWX's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MOTI has underperformed ACWX with an annualized return of 6.42%, while ACWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
MOTI
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- -7.41%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
ACWX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
MOTI vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | -7.14% | 25.01% | 1.94% | 10.18% | -6.93% | 0.03% | 7.24% | 17.63% | -13.92% | 34.27% |
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 13.42% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTI and ACWX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MOTI and ACWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOTI vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTI
ACWX
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
MOTI
ACWX
Consumer Defensive
MOTI
ACWX
Consumer Cyclical
MOTI
ACWX
Healthcare
MOTI
ACWX
Technology
MOTI
ACWX
Basic Materials
MOTI
ACWX
Communication Services
MOTI
ACWX
Financial Services
MOTI
ACWX
Energy
MOTI
-
ACWX
Real Estate
MOTI
-
ACWX
Utilities
MOTI
-
ACWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTI vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank
MOTI
ACWX
MOTI vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTI | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.32 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 2.53 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 9.69 | -9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTI vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum ACWX drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and ACWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTI | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.70% | -60.40% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -11.42% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -13.84% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.03% | -30.07% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | -35.38% | -1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -1.82% | -10.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -13.32% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 2.98% | +3.06% |
Volatility
MOTI vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) is 3.50%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that MOTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTI | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 7.03% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 14.36% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 16.43% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 16.46% | +1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.43% | +0.62% |
MOTI vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTI vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison
MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than ACWX's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.49% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.47% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTI and ACWX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to MOTI (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs ACWX's -60.40%.
On 10-year performance, ACWX leads with 9.87% vs 6.42% for MOTI. On fees, ACWX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.
MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.49% for ACWX.
MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.32% for ACWX.
ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTI and ACWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer