PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTG vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTG vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.96% return.


MOTG

1D
0.05%
1M
1.44%
YTD
0.34%
6M
2.72%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*

VEA

1D
0.63%
1M
5.24%
YTD
15.96%
6M
19.86%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
0.34%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%30.43%-3.89%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.96%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and VEA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018

0.89

The correlation between MOTG and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTG vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTG
VEA

Industrials

26.4%
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

17.3%
5.6%

Technology

17.1%
13.8%

Healthcare

13.9%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
7.5%

Financial Services

7.3%
23.3%

Communication Services

6.7%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
7.5%

Energy

-

5.4%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Industrials

MOTG
26.4%
VEA
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
17.3%
VEA
5.6%

Technology

MOTG
17.1%
VEA
13.8%

Healthcare

MOTG
13.9%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
10.3%
VEA
7.5%

Financial Services

MOTG
7.3%
VEA
23.3%

Communication Services

MOTG
6.7%
VEA
3.4%

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.1%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

MOTG

-

VEA
5.4%

Real Estate

MOTG

-

VEA
2.7%

Utilities

MOTG

-

VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTG vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOTGVEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

2.10

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

2.89

-1.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.38

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.94

-2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.07

11.50

-8.43

MOTG vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOTGVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.10

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.61

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.25

+0.39

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTGVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-60.68%

+28.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-11.63%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-13.45%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

-29.71%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

0.00%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-13.29%

+8.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

2.98%

+0.70%

Volatility

MOTG vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 4.34%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTGVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

5.73%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

13.30%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.78%

15.66%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

16.55%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

17.36%

+0.49%

MOTG vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTG vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.69%, more than VEA's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
17.69%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTG and VEA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to MOTG (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 10.01% vs 6.79% for MOTG. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.01% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.69%, compared with 2.59% for VEA.

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer