MOTG vs. POW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. MOTG is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

MOTG vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.98% return.

MOTG

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 6.68%
• 6M: 3.28%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 1Y: 12.74%
• 3Y*: 14.85%
• 5Y*: 7.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.96%

POW

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -5.46%
• 6M: 18.56%
• YTD: 38.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	$14.07K	$24.07K	$42.57K
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.18M	$2.14M	$2.63M

MOTG vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	6.17%	-0.43%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.98%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and POW is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTG

MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 31
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTG vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTG	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.88	—	—

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTG	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.82%	-28.02%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.34%	+18.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-5.66%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOTG	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	34.48%	-20.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.93%	34.48%	-18.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.76%	34.48%	-16.72%

MOTG vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.72%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	16.72%	17.75%	5.60%	1.86%	3.64%	5.88%	2.96%	3.91%	0.45%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTG and POW in my portfolio?

MOTG and POW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MOTG or POW?

On fees, MOTG is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTG or POW?

MOTG is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTG or POW?

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 16.72%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between MOTG and POW?

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.75% for POW.