PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOTG vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOTG vs. BDVL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MOTG tracks the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index while BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.

Performance

MOTG vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than BDVL's 4.71% return.

MOTG

1D
-1.46%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
0.57%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
—

BDVL

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.43%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF		-1.12%1.09%
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF		4.71%1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and BDVL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.80

MOTG vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOTG
BDVL

Industrials

26.4%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

17.3%
6.3%

Technology

17.1%
23.0%

Healthcare

13.9%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
8.5%

Financial Services

7.3%
13.9%

Communication Services

6.7%
10.7%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.6%

Energy

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

4.8%

Industrials

MOTG
26.4%
BDVL
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
17.3%
BDVL
6.3%

Technology

MOTG
17.1%
BDVL
23.0%

Healthcare

MOTG
13.9%
BDVL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
10.3%
BDVL
8.5%

Financial Services

MOTG
7.3%
BDVL
13.9%

Communication Services

MOTG
6.7%
BDVL
10.7%

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.1%
BDVL
2.6%

Energy

MOTG

-

BDVL
2.8%

Real Estate

MOTG

-

BDVL
1.0%

Utilities

MOTG

-

BDVL
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF

iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF

Often compared with MOTG:
MOTG vs. MOATMOTG vs. MOTIMOTG vs. ACWIMOTG vs. GCOWMOTG vs. SPYMOTG vs. XDEB.DEMOTG vs. EATZ
Often compared with BDVL:
BDVL vs. CGGEBDVL vs. VTBDVL vs. DFAWBDVL vs. UFOBDVL vs. IVESBDVL vs. AVGVBDVL vs. PAWZ

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
BDVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MOTGBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.67

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.05

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOTG vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MOTGBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.01

-0.39

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and BDVL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOTGBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-7.71%

-24.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.54%

-0.95%

-5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-1.19%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

—

—

Volatility

MOTG vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOTGBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

9.49%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

9.49%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

9.49%

+8.36%

MOTG vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than BDVL's 2.66% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF		2.66%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF		17.95%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOTG and BDVL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 2.66% for BDVL.

MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer