MODL vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MODL returned 18.29%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

MODL vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 10.93% return.

MODL

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 7.19%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.70%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	$1.69M	$2.90M	$3.17M
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M

MODL vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	7.88%	18.99%	24.73%	23.74%	6.45%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MODL and TDVG is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022	0.84

The correlation between MODL and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

MODL vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MODL	TDVG
Technology	32.3%	27.4%
Financial Services	20.2%	19.3%
Healthcare	18.3%	12.8%
Communication Services	9.7%	0.8%
Utilities	5.0%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	6.7%
Basic Materials	4.6%	2.8%
Industrials	4.6%	14.4%
Energy	0.0%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	6.6%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

MODL vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MODL

MODL Risk / Return Rank: 60
MODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
MODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
MODL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MODL Martin Ratio Rank: 66

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MODL vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MODL	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.87	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.69	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.51	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.00	10.48	-2.47

MODL vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MODL Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MODL and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MODL vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MODL	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-19.20%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.46%	-7.24%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.60%	-14.02%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-0.92%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.00%	-3.67%	+1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	1.73%	+0.45%

Volatility

MODL vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that MODL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MODL	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	2.20%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.32%	7.30%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	9.74%	+2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	13.87%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.53%	13.81%	+0.72%

MODL vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MODL vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	0.70%	0.67%	0.83%	1.02%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MODL and TDVG in my portfolio?

MODL and TDVG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MODL or TDVG?

MODL has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MODL dropped -17.60% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, MODL or TDVG?

On 3-year performance, MODL leads with 18.29% vs 14.55% for TDVG. On fees, MODL is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MODL or TDVG?

Over the 3-year period, MODL has performed better with a 18.29% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MODL or TDVG?

MODL is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MODL or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.70% for MODL.

What is the main difference between MODL and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Victory and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.