MODL vs. SPTM
MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MODL is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MODL returned 20.33%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
MODL vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.
MODL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
MODL vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 7.80% | 18.99% | 24.73% | 23.74% | 7.13% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MODL and SPTM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MODL and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
MODL vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MODL
SPTM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MODL
SPTM
Financial Services
MODL
SPTM
Communication Services
MODL
SPTM
Healthcare
MODL
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
MODL
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
MODL
SPTM
Utilities
MODL
SPTM
Industrials
MODL
SPTM
Energy
MODL
SPTM
Basic Materials
MODL
-
SPTM
Real Estate
MODL
-
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MODL vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
MODL
SPTM
MODL vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MODL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 2.36 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 3.23 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.22 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 15.01 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MODL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.36 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.46 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
MODL vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MODL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -54.80% | +37.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -8.68% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -18.87% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.67% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -9.05% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.86% | +0.24% |
Volatility
MODL vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) is 2.63%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that MODL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MODL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.88% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 8.92% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 11.88% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 16.87% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 18.03% | -3.44% |
MODL vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MODL vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 0.67% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 1.02% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, MODL and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPTM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to MODL (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MODL dropped -17.60% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 21.90% vs 20.33% for MODL. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MODL has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 20.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MODL.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.67% for MODL.
They also come from different issuers: Victory and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MODL and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer