MODL vs. GXLC
MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MODL is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
MODL vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 10.06% return.
MODL
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.70%
GXLC
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.98K | $20.23K | $17.31K | |
| $1.69M | $2.90M | $3.17M |
MODL vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 7.88% | 3.35% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 10.06% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MODL and GXLC is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MODL vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank
MODL
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MODL vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MODL | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MODL vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MODL | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -9.08% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.48% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -1.58% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | — | — |
Volatility
MODL vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MODL | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 13.60% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 13.60% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 13.60% | +0.93% |
MODL vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MODL vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than GXLC's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.64% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF | 0.70% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 1.02% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, MODL and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MODL.
MODL has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.64% for GXLC.
They also come from different issuers: Victory and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for MODL and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer