MNZL vs. SPXM
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MNZL is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
MNZL vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNZL
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 18.20%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.20% | 2.90% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and SPXM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNZL | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.84 | 1.56 | +1.28 |
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -5.08% | -4.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.75% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -0.79% | -0.95% |
Volatility
MNZL vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 8.16% | +7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 8.16% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 8.16% | +7.57% |
MNZL vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and SPXM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer