MNST vs. AAPL
MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. MNST operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MNST returned 13.79%/yr vs 29.36%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MNST vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 13.79%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.36% annualized return.
MNST
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 48.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
MNST vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 21.08% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and AAPL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MNST and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MNST:
$91.74B
AAPL:
$4.30T
MNST:
$2.06
AAPL:
$8.24
MNST:
45.05
AAPL:
35.35
MNST:
3.52
AAPL:
4.65
MNST:
10.41
AAPL:
9.60
MNST:
10.51
AAPL:
40.37
MNST:
$8.79B
AAPL:
$451.44B
MNST:
$4.88B
AAPL:
$216.07B
MNST:
$2.70B
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNST vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
MNST
AAPL
MNST vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNST | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.40 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 8.47 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNST vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNST | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -81.80% | +12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -13.80% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -33.36% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -33.36% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | -38.52% | +8.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.64% | +7.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -29.59% | +8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 5.53% | +0.69% |
Volatility
MNST vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.50%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNST | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 6.73% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | 16.53% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 22.64% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 27.52% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 28.92% | -2.67% |
Dividends
MNST vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MNST vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNST vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MNST and AAPL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNST and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer