MNSO vs. GFI
MNSO (MINISO Group Holding Limited) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. MNSO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, MNSO returned -2.40%/yr vs 31.37%/yr for GFI. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MNSO vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -29.00% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's -23.58% return.
MNSO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- 6M
- -27.88%
- YTD
- -29.00%
- 1Y
- -29.50%
- 3Y*
- -11.73%
- 5Y*
- -2.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -8.10%
GFI
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -33.43%
- YTD
- -23.58%
- 1Y
- 38.42%
- 3Y*
- 37.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.92M | $118.13M | $131.61M | |
| $8.35M | $8.46M | $8.33M |
MNSO vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited | -29.00% | -18.93% | 20.92% | 93.11% | 6.38% | -60.35% | 8.16% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -23.58% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | -28.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNSO and GFI is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020 | 0.14 |
The correlation between MNSO and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MNSO:
$3.97B
GFI:
$29.02B
MNSO:
CN¥6.68
GFI:
$5.39
MNSO:
13.13
GFI:
6.01
MNSO:
0.08
GFI:
0.10
MNSO:
1.18
GFI:
2.07
MNSO:
2.46
GFI:
3.44
MNSO:
CN¥22.58B
GFI:
$13.98B
MNSO:
CN¥10.10B
GFI:
$7.34B
MNSO:
CN¥3.73B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNSO vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
MNSO
GFI
MNSO vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNSO | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.81 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 1.70 | -2.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNSO vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNSO | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.58% | -88.05% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.02% | -47.72% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.36% | -47.72% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.77% | -56.22% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.97% | -45.76% | -11.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.85% | -44.24% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.33% | 22.70% | +10.63% |
Volatility
MNSO vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) has a higher volatility of 13.29% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 12.44%. This indicates that MNSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNSO | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.29% | 12.44% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.55% | 46.19% | -20.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.99% | 61.58% | -20.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.48% | 52.84% | +13.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.12% | 54.58% | +13.54% |
Dividends
MNSO vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than GFI's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.68% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited | 5.12% | 3.29% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MNSO vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNSO vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
MNSO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
MNSO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
MNSO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MNSO and GFI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNSO has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to GFI (12.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNSO dropped -86.58% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNSO and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer