MNDFX vs. EXBAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MNDFX (Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series) and EXBAX (Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series) are both mutual funds - MNDFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Manning & Napier, while EXBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Manning & Napier. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX returned 5.16%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for EXBAX. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MNDFX charges 0.54%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for EXBAX.

Performance

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 17.06% return, which is significantly higher than EXBAX's 2.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MNDFX having a 5.16% annualized return and EXBAX not far ahead at 5.39%.

MNDFX

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 10.62%
• YTD: 17.06%
• 1Y: 31.07%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 5.16%
• ALL TIME*: 8.31%

EXBAX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.88%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 1Y: 6.74%
• 3Y*: 7.03%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: 5.39%
• ALL TIME*: 4.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series	17.06%	15.76%	11.60%	5.64%	-4.22%	22.45%	2.44%	-28.95%	-4.30%	23.39%
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series	2.14%	9.29%	6.11%	11.13%	-14.52%	7.97%	14.96%	16.15%	-3.54%	11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MNDFX and EXBAX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between MNDFX and EXBAX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MNDFX vs. EXBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNDFX

MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 93
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

EXBAX

EXBAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
EXBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EXBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EXBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
EXBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
EXBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNDFX	EXBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	0.85	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	1.25	+2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.15	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	0.84	+3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.66	3.28	+12.38

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the EXBAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDFX and EXBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than EXBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and EXBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNDFX	EXBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.03%	-29.86%	-32.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-7.37%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-7.52%	-8.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.87%	-19.23%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.03%	-19.23%	-42.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-0.34%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.90%	-5.04%	-6.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	1.89%	-0.08%

Volatility

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) at 2.01%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNDFX	EXBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	2.01%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	6.10%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.44%	7.33%	+4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	7.69%	+6.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.64%	7.66%	+13.98%

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EXBAX's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Dividend Comparison

MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than EXBAX's 6.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series	6.71%	5.77%	4.57%	2.27%	0.99%	6.67%	6.31%	4.83%	5.08%	6.09%	1.81%	0.58%
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series	8.45%	9.64%	10.46%	7.81%	9.77%	7.31%	1.93%	5.18%	15.02%	24.95%	4.89%	15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNDFX and EXBAX in my portfolio?

MNDFX and EXBAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNDFX or EXBAX?

MNDFX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to EXBAX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDFX dropped -62.03% vs EXBAX's -29.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.