MNDFX vs. EXBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993.
Performance
MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -4.84% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than EXBAX's -4.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed EXBAX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while EXBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.08% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
EXBAX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EXBAX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. EXBAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
EXBAX
MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.43 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 0.66 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.38 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 1.69 | +3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.43 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.29 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.67 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and EXBAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than EXBAX's 6.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than EXBAX's maximum drawdown of -29.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and EXBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -29.86% | -32.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -7.37% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -19.23% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -19.23% | -42.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -6.96% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -5.07% | -7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 1.67% | +1.47% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. EXBAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) at 2.98%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | EXBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.98% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 5.03% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 7.91% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 7.50% | +7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 7.60% | +14.07% |