EXBAX vs. EXCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX).
EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993. EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005.
Performance
EXBAX vs. EXCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXBAX vs. EXCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -3.39% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -14.52% | 7.97% | 14.96% | 16.15% | -3.54% | 11.59% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXBAX achieves a -3.39% return, which is significantly lower than EXCRX's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EXBAX has outperformed EXCRX with an annualized return of 5.24%, while EXCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.
EXBAX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXBAX vs. EXCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXBAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than EXCRX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXBAX vs. EXCRX — Risk / Return Rank
EXBAX
EXCRX
EXBAX vs. EXCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.85 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 1.22 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.29 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 3.59 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.85 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | -0.00 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.33 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.72 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXBAX and EXCRX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EXBAX vs. EXCRX - Dividend Comparison
EXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, more than EXCRX's 4.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 5.97% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
EXBAX vs. EXCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, which is greater than EXCRX's maximum drawdown of -18.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXBAX and EXCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.86% | -18.70% | -11.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -3.09% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -18.65% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.23% | -18.70% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -3.11% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -2.87% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.11% | +0.59% |
Volatility
EXBAX vs. EXCRX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) at 1.79%. This indicates that EXBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXBAX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 1.79% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | 2.73% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.03% | 4.60% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 5.87% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.61% | 4.83% | +2.78% |