PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXBAX vs. EXDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXBAX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than EXDVX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EXBAX has outperformed EXDVX with an annualized return of 5.39%, while EXDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.34% annualized return.


EXBAX

1D
0.76%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.88%
YTD
2.14%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
5.39%
ALL TIME*
4.15%

EXDVX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.09%
6M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
2.38%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.34%
ALL TIME*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXBAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series
2.14%9.29%6.11%11.13%-14.52%7.97%14.96%16.15%-3.54%11.59%
EXDVX
Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund
-0.23%4.30%0.41%4.10%-5.83%0.16%5.73%5.10%0.65%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EXBAX and EXDVX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 1994

0.14

Over the past year, EXBAX and EXDVX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXBAX vs. EXDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EXBAX
EXBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EXBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EXBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

EXDVX
EXDVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EXDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EXDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXBAXEXDVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.47

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

1.38

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

3.90

-0.62

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXBAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the EXDVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXBAX and EXDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, which is greater than EXDVX's maximum drawdown of -12.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXBAX and EXDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXBAXEXDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.86%

-12.74%

-17.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-2.44%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.52%

-3.74%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-9.29%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.23%

-9.29%

-9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.80%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-2.18%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

0.86%

+1.03%

Volatility

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX) at 0.67%. This indicates that EXBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXBAXEXDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

0.67%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

1.46%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.33%

1.79%

+5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

2.71%

+4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.66%

2.97%

+4.69%

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXBAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than EXDVX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXBAX vs. EXDVX - Dividend Comparison

EXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than EXDVX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXBAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series
6.71%5.77%4.57%2.27%0.99%6.67%6.31%4.83%5.08%6.09%1.81%0.58%
EXDVX
Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund
2.36%2.26%1.87%1.67%0.61%6.02%1.69%2.81%1.38%1.25%1.10%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXBAX and EXDVX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXBAX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to EXDVX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXBAX dropped -29.86% vs EXDVX's -12.74%.

EXDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXBAX and EXDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer