PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNDFX vs. EXDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 17.06% return, which is significantly higher than EXDVX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has outperformed EXDVX with an annualized return of 5.16%, while EXDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.34% annualized return.


MNDFX

1D
-0.60%
1M
1.63%
6M
10.62%
YTD
17.06%
1Y
31.07%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
5.16%
ALL TIME*
8.31%

EXDVX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.09%
6M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
2.38%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.34%
ALL TIME*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
17.06%15.76%11.60%5.64%-4.22%22.45%2.44%-28.95%-4.30%23.39%
EXDVX
Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund
-0.23%4.30%0.41%4.10%-5.83%0.16%5.73%5.10%0.65%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MNDFX and EXDVX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008

-0.09

The correlation between MNDFX and EXDVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNDFX vs. EXDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNDFX
MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EXDVX
EXDVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EXDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EXDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNDFXEXDVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

1.38

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.66

3.90

+11.75

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the EXDVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDFX and EXDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than EXDVX's maximum drawdown of -12.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and EXDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNDFXEXDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-12.74%

-49.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-2.44%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-3.74%

-12.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-9.29%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

-9.29%

-52.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.80%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-2.18%

-9.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

0.86%

+0.95%

Volatility

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX) at 0.67%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNDFXEXDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

0.67%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

1.46%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

1.79%

+9.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

2.71%

+11.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

2.97%

+18.67%

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EXDVX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNDFX vs. EXDVX - Dividend Comparison

MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than EXDVX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXDVX
Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund
2.36%2.26%1.87%1.67%0.61%6.02%1.69%2.81%1.38%1.25%1.10%0.86%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
8.45%9.64%10.46%7.81%9.77%7.31%1.93%5.18%15.02%24.95%4.89%15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNDFX and EXDVX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNDFX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to EXDVX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDFX dropped -62.03% vs EXDVX's -12.74%.

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNDFX and EXDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer