MNDFX vs. EXOSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. EXOSX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Jul 9, 2002.
Performance
MNDFX vs. EXOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. EXOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | -7.05% | 16.21% | 3.33% | 19.89% | -24.26% | 11.50% | 27.07% | 27.52% | -17.23% | 23.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than EXOSX's -7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed EXOSX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while EXOSX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.47% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
EXOSX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. EXOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EXOSX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. EXOSX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
EXOSX
MNDFX vs. EXOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.17 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 0.35 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.05 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.15 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 0.56 | +5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.17 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.09 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.39 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.38 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and EXOSX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. EXOSX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than EXOSX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | 1.22% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 0.82% | 1.85% | 0.86% | 1.72% | 0.91% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. EXOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than EXOSX's maximum drawdown of -55.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and EXOSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -55.50% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -11.77% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -37.71% | +19.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -37.71% | -24.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -11.38% | +5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -11.12% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.05% | +0.09% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. EXOSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 3.14%, while Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | EXOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 5.78% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 9.88% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 16.27% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 16.51% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 16.59% | +5.08% |