MNDFX vs. EXCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005.
Performance
MNDFX vs. EXCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. EXCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.17% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than EXCRX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has outperformed EXCRX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while EXCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. EXCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EXCRX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. EXCRX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
EXCRX
MNDFX vs. EXCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.84 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.22 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 4.13 | +1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.84 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.01 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.33 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.72 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and EXCRX is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. EXCRX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than EXCRX's 4.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. EXCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than EXCRX's maximum drawdown of -18.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and EXCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -18.70% | -43.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -3.09% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -18.65% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -18.70% | -43.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -3.21% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -2.87% | -9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 1.10% | +2.04% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. EXCRX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) at 1.81%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 1.81% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 2.73% | +5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 4.61% | +11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 5.87% | +8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 4.83% | +16.84% |